Menu
Log in


"Why the Army didn’t finish testing the Sig Sauer P320 during the XM17 competition"

  • 05 Aug 2025 08:51
    Message # 13528386

    Comment - Personal Opinion:  The Army has a lot of explaining to do after reading this article and its link to the GAO investigation regarding the denial of the Glock protest on the Army awarding the contract to SIG.  Yes, the Government rules about acceptable low bidder meeting specifications apply, but only after fully verifying the specification has been met by the lowest bidder.  Exceeding the performance requirements of the specification should be a considerable deciding factor in the award decision, cost not withstanding BUT it was not here:  Cost overrode.  This is a statement made all the time:  "Good Enough for Government Work."  

    https://www.wearethemighty.com/tactical/why-the-army-didnt-finish-testing-the-sig-sauer-p320/

    "Why the Army didn’t finish testing the Sig Sauer P320 during the XM17 competition"

    'It came down to cost."


    By Miguel Ortiz

    Published Jul 31, 2025 5:00 AM PDT

    Quote:

    Glock protested the Army’s premature selection of the Sig Sauer submission and asked that testing resume. An investigation by the Government Accountability Office found that “Sig Sauer’s full-sized handgun had a higher stoppage rate than Glock’s handgun, and there may have been other problems with the weapon’s accuracy.”

    The investigation also noted that the Army redacted the results of Sig’s compact handgun. Sig submitted two handgun frames in three different grip sizes with a swappable trigger unit, while Glock submitted one handgun with interchangeable backstraps to meet the Army’s modularity requirements.

    In the end, Glock’s protest was denied.

    “[T]here is no correlating superior performance factor for Glock, as compared to Sig Sauer’s, to support paying that premium. Consequently, I cannot justify paying a price premium of 37% for the Glock submission, even as a second award,” wrote Susan Poling in the GAO report. She did note the investigation uncovered “evaluation errors” by the Army, but could not justify paying more for the Glock.

    The short of it is that Sig Sauer’s price to the government was so low that the Army felt that it had a good enough pistol at a great price. So, testing was stopped and did not resume.

    XM17 competition

    US Army Photo


    Last modified: 05 Aug 2025 10:26 | Anonymous member

Mailing address:

6167 East 155th Place
Thornton, CO 80602

Contact
    

The Association of Air Force Missileers

is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization. 

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software